I have mentioned on a couple or several posts on this thread topic about trying to use the CC website font application but you people have chosen on each of those occasions selectively some how not to respond to those posts of mine. It was recommended on this thread that try out the advanced text application on VSD that that is the way to go so I followed that suggestion and then had a one and one half week long drawn out process of dealing with that. then there is all of this why not do this or why not do that well I say why not suggest this or that in the first place
I am addressing the website font application problem again, I made up some headings but could not read the pdf file instructions and figure out how to get them to work on the site cannot figure out which files to load up where and how to get the html code onto the pg with the vsd program as per adding it as an html snippet The instructions do not tell you well enough how to load the snippet onto the pg and get it to where you want it on the pg file
But all of the website font controversy has come up as an after thought while trying to deal with the advanced font issues with VSD
Then after getting all of the advanced fonts up on all of the pgs it is pointed out to me that they do not have the alternate text and that needs to be there so I go through lots of time fixing that
Then afterthat is fixed it is pointed out to my why did you not do this or why did you not do that I am asking why did you not suggest this or that in the first place
I will try and start implementing better text practices on the pgs on future new pgs
then I may go back and improve the current pgs.