Played a little with both but think the "penny just dropped" and I suddenly feel I get it. However, working towards a purchase and there in lies my problem...

I like the menu builder & I can foresee a point when I might like the button builder.
I'd really like the HTML Editor and Website insight but this then leads me to the value in the "Super Pack" however this then points me in the direction of RLM rather than RSD. Since both these products come for the same price (atm) it seems that RLM offers more for the money (just wish menu integration was more slick with it).

Decisions decisions - perhaps I should just build a sample test website with each and see which suits my style of working best...

Hi Steve,

Yes if you like to use HTML Editor to build websites then RLM will be your best bet as you can create your framework and then complete the website manually.

I would completely agree to download the trial of each and see which suites you better.

Personally, I really think it has to do with your creation process. For me, I use RLM, RSD, and HTML Editor.

I build the framework in RLM. It allows me to conceptualize what I want. I don't try to build every page in RLM. I just build the main templates that will be used for the pages.

I then export from RLM and use RSD to create the pages from the templates set up in RLM and add things that RLM doesn't (shadows, curved corners, etc.) I also use RSD to add features such as buttons, menus, sliders, etc.

Lastly, if needed, I then export and add the finishing touches using HTML Editor.

If I were to bypass something in this process, it would be RLM since technically RSD can do what RLM does. I just find RLM easier to use for the initial framework because it's easier to focus solely on framework.