Visually Impaired - Post ID 78988

User 282670 Photo


Registered User
3,940 posts

you guys are good!!!! I'm gonna do some reading myself it's very interesting.thanks




User 37670 Photo


Registered User
2,138 posts

I am jumping in way late here, but adding my opinion just the same.

You should always add that alt text to any images, be it in VSD or hand coding images. The screen reader will read that alternative text for anyone who needs it. Not just for the blind. When doing research I can turn on the screen reader and still get myself a snack while I "listen" to the web page.

You can use a <noscript> tag to add content to anything like flash or javascript. If the visitor to the web page has flash animation turned off (maybe they are blind for example), the content between the <noscript> Read this description of the flash images in order.... </noscript> should be read by the screen reader and let that person in on what content would have been displayed.
I had one person say to me "what the heck would a blind person be doing on the Internet in the first place?" I said "surfing the net like anyone else". If I lost my site, would it be fair to ask me to loose my Internet as well?

Build your site for your audience. There is little to no chance at all that the E-Learning services I provide will be surfed by a blind person, so I have not added all of the possible features. Works fine that way for what the site was designed, but it's always a consideration when I build a new site.
E-Learning Specialist
www.mainsites.ca is my website, and yes, some of it is crappy.
User 355448 Photo


Ambassador
3,144 posts

Bass4Uphill wrote:
I just performed a quick test. The alternative test shows up in Internet Explorer but not in Firefox. Nothing to do with nothing, I suppose, but interesting. Still no idea whether it can be seen by a text-to-voice app.


For a mouse over text, the correct method is used by Firefox. Each image should not only have an alt entry, but also a title entry. You will then have something like:
<img src="some.jpg" width="100" height="100" title="image description" alt="another image description">

When programming the image, it does not take long to add the title while doing the alt, and you can make both have the same text if that is what you want.
User 130978 Photo


Ambassador
3,025 posts

BillR wrote:
Bass4Uphill wrote:
I just performed a quick test. The alternative test shows up in Internet Explorer but not in Firefox. Nothing to do with nothing, I suppose, but interesting. Still no idea whether it can be seen by a text-to-voice app.


For a mouse over text, the correct method is used by Firefox. Each image should not only have an alt entry, but also a title entry. You will then have something like:
<img src="some.jpg" width="100" height="100" title="image description" alt="another image description">

When programming the image, it does not take long to add the title while doing the alt, and you can make both have the same text if that is what you want.


Actually, I read that you should alter the text slightly in these two tags...and using slightly different text in each the alt and title tags gives you two more SEO opportunities :)
User 597929 Photo


Registered User
1,332 posts

I'm at work right now so can't check, but does VSD even give the option of a title text slot? I only recall it giving button and alt text options.
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." -- Frank Zappa

Visit Spinland Studios: http://www.spinland.biz
User 355448 Photo


Ambassador
3,144 posts

Melanie Edman-Osmer wrote:

Actually, I read that you should alter the text slightly in these two tags...and using slightly different text in each the alt and title tags gives you two more SEO opportunities :)


Now I have a project to go back and adjust these tags. That should be something that will keep me busy and off the streets for a while. :D
User 130978 Photo


Ambassador
3,025 posts

BillR wrote:
Melanie Edman-Osmer wrote:

Actually, I read that you should alter the text slightly in these two tags...and using slightly different text in each the alt and title tags gives you two more SEO opportunities :)


Now I have a project to go back and adjust these tags. That should be something that will keep me busy and off the streets for a while. :D


Just doin' my civic duty, Bill :P
User 130978 Photo


Ambassador
3,025 posts

Spinny wrote:
I'm at work right now so can't check, but does VSD even give the option of a title text slot? I only recall it giving button and alt text options.


Hmmmm....you may be right. I don't use VSD all the time, so not sure...but I think you are right...

User 597929 Photo


Registered User
1,332 posts

I forgot about this thread. Yeah, in doing a new VSD site I looked for a "Title" slot in the dialog boxes and there ain't so such critter.
"You can't be a real country unless you have a beer and an airline - it helps if you have some kind of a football team, or some nuclear weapons, but at the very least you need a beer." -- Frank Zappa

Visit Spinland Studios: http://www.spinland.biz
User 130978 Photo


Ambassador
3,025 posts

ahh, phooey....well, one SEO op lopped...

Have something to add? We’d love to hear it!
You must have an account to participate. Please Sign In Here, then join the conversation.