Ok guys, let's not get our knickers in a knot.
Please don't scream at me, I didn't forget to back it up. I am just the guy who has to try to put someone else's screw up back together. The previous version was pre 6.x. Therefore, nothing in the sever backup directory except the new ones that have been partially restored.
I am not new to visual/gui programming. When I was in the development area, two other guys and I started the Advanced Technology Group at an international consulting firm when the first 4GL languages came out. I wrote courses on Object oriented analysis and design for internal use and initiated an internal program to promote the use of 4GL's. Brought in Powerbuilder, SQLWindows (later became Centura) and Smalltalk, Smalltalk with Frames, and the original C. These were the leading edge technologies at the time and required a huge paradigm shift to understand. You guys may have never even heard of them because some of them were probably being used before you were born but are the building blocks of today's technology that you are so proficient in

.
So, what you are telling me is that the "Files" or the pages that are stored are OUTPUT rather than INPUT. Ok, I can be one with that. So basically the "Source" file is essentially embedded in the .vnu file, if I understand you correctly. And the "Files" are the html code that is loaded to the host for use. Please excuse my use of the archaic term of Source files but I beg your indulgence here.
So, since the previous OUTPUT files are still there, you are saying that I can pop into them and modify the HTML to update the links and to modivy it, but would have to do all maintenance from this point on with plain, old fashioned HTML. They cannot be reversed into a .vnu and must be maintained manually.
Ok, fair enough. As I said earlier, I am up the proverbial creek without the necessary paddle. My source is gone, for all intents and purposes. Now that you have given me an insight into the architecture of your product I have a better understanding of the manner in which it performs.
Is there somewhere that I can go to understand this a little more? I really can't find where the architecture is explained except for one brief reference in the help pdf where it says that the website is saved in the .vnu file. That really doesn't tell me much but thanks to Scott's message, I think that I have a better understanding. I retract my comment about the lack of standards since it was made because I was ignorant of the architecture.
So, I guess that my choices are to totally start over from scratch or to go the HTML route which means that the VSD product is now totally unusable from this point on
for this particular website, if I understand the architecture properly. At least that is what I infer from my flawed and incomplete comprehension.
Thanks for the info. I really do appreciate the increase in my knowledge and the decrease in my ignorance.
Mike
Mike Shanahan