Suggestions for CoffeeCup PixConverter

Home » Forums » PixConverter » Suggestions for CoffeeCup PixConverter


VP of Product Development
25,042 posts
Online Now

We want your ideas, suggestions, and comments about CoffeeCup PixConverter. So tell us: How can we make the software even better? Remember, our products are here for you guys, so we want to make them the very best we can :)
~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~_~
Scott A. Swedorski - VP of Product Development
CoffeeCup Software Inc.
Phone: 678.495.3480

"Want to update your website from anywhere? Check out our new free service, S-Drive Streams. Visit http://www.coffeecup.com/sdrive for more information."


Senior Advisor
1,143 posts

Captions for Individual Thumbnails:

I am using the neat little program CC PixConverter to generate thumbnail pages for scanned images of newspaper articles. The thumbnails are then linked to full-screen displays of the images on my site. When I first set it up, with a fairly large number of images referenced from a few different, categorized thumbnail pages, I could not find a way to provide a caption for the individual images. Instead, the 'Page Heading' and the 'Page Comment' that I specify for the thumbnail page is repeated for each associated full-scale image page. Since I really needed a descriptive caption for each image page, I went in and manually modified the HTML files and replaced the 'standard' caption with a specific one for that image. I did this for about 100 images, which, although time-consuming, I felt I could live with since I saw it as a one-time effort.

My real problems started when I needed to update by adding new articles, the thumbnails for which I wanted to appear first, i.e. at the top of the thumbnail page.
I am naming the image files in such a way that they will sort alphabetically with the latest article appearing first, but if I regenerate the thumbnail page at each update to accomplish this, I lose all my image captions! So I am back to manually inserting the updated thumbnail information, etc. in the HTML files.
The table set-up of the thumbnail page makes this a nightmare. So now my questions are:

1. Is there anybody out there who has had a similar problem and who has come up with a nifty, time-saving solution? I am a novice and may have overlooked the obvious...
2. Would the CC team consider a program update, which would allow for captions to be specified for individual images? (please say yes!)

I am using all CC for my site, e.g. HTML Editor, PhotoGallery, JukeBox, PixConverter, StylesheetMaker, ColorSchemer, etc., and for all kinds of reasons I prefer to stay with the CC program, rather than Googling for other programs that may do what I am looking for. But maybe I have to give up?

My thumbnail pages are linked to from here: www.mingas.com/press.html (the full thumbnail pages are reached by clicking on time frames in the right-hand side of the page)
Per
www.mingas.com


Registered User
12 posts

I miss an important feature, just bought the program today but...

When renaming the images I can choose from various options, ao option 1 with a one number digit attached f.e. image_1, image_2 etc so far so good and that was what I needed. But when working I immediately missed something: I can't tell the program with which digit to start. When there are already image_1 amd image_2 in the folder, I want the program to start with image_3 and count onwards. Maybe I missed it, but I think it is an flaw in the program.

Help? Or maybe a suggestion? Can't be that difficult I think?


Senior Advisor
3,910 posts

I believe they can also be saved as image_A, etc; :) "It's A Smart Person That Asks"



Registered User
10 posts

Would LOVE to be able to watermark and html gallery in one step with great quality images. But, alas...

Currently, I create the watermarked images 1st as I create images for 'My Website,' put them in a folder.... THEN I have to go back and get those watermarked images in order to create the html gallery. Quality is lost already in the 1st step, then it's lost again w/ the 2nd.

Better quality pictures on all output would be MAGNIFICENTO, lol. (yes, I did slide the quality all the way to 100% :-> ).

This program works LOADS better for my clients to view their images (instead of the photo gallery program). That's why I would like better quality.

pretty please :-) ...and thank you ;-)
jackie (the chick half of christopher goldston, lol)

Have something to add? We’d love to hear it!
You must have an account to participate. Please Sign In Here, then join the conversation.